🔗 Share this article

I possess some opinions regarding that remarks delivered by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer after the Serbian champion's win over Taylor Fritz in the New York major last eight. Look – the athlete represents American, the commentator is American – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. Some disappointment would have been appropriate. Rather, he brought up the continued drought of American men at the majors: not one of them has won a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone love a storyline, me too. But come on. Even if Fritz had beaten Djokovic for the first time, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the next round, who he has never defeated in an official match. And had he somehow gotten past that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, against whom Fritz had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also split the last seven grand slams (plus the Spaniard proceeded to defeat a tired Serbian in the subsequent match). He stated in post-match interviews following his defeat that he in fact preferred his path, because it offered the chance to beat the three best players in the sport back-to-back. Fritz is well justified to aspire to the achievement; an competitor is supposed to have faith in themselves. But going into that Djokovic quarter-final what other person in their right mind had the lack of US winners on the brain?

The American star's second serve the sole barrier standing in her way and consistent victories

Fritz, 28, is ranked fourth in the world starting the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has won his previous six matches over No 3 the German with growing comfort. Presumably he could claim that position for himself in the future. But it’s clear that right now, that’s as far as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard lie a vast gap of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class delivery and powerful strength on each front side and backhand are sufficiently adequate to defeat most rivals on the ATP tour. Against the select few generational talents, however, he is frequently overmatched. The last several seasons has seen the curious rise of lanky, towering athletes who can nevertheless cover the court with the surprising speed and grace of much shorter men. Fritz is six-foot-five and appears that way. His movement is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he seldom win a rally that the opponent was dictating, and playing a drop shot against him is typically a safe bet. That acts as a quite harsh restriction on his potential.

Fritz has achieved a number of dramatic, improbable advancements over the years. Early on of the decade, he was circling the lower end of the top 30. 24 months later, he was sniffing the elite ten. Last year, he suddenly exploded to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and including a aging Serbian, is the highest of all. What was Fowler have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the ongoing drought of US male players lifting grand slams when Fritz had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just too much and the respect for the magnitude of the task insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a personal best advancement to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.

Fritz’s play in that very last eight match ought to have been enough of an sign. Djokovic triumphed in four sets, a victory that only felt tenuous for moments towards the very end, when Fritz had saved a few championship opportunities and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the exchanges, with the American earning numerous opportunities to break. But Djokovic saved service break opportunity after service break opportunity, prolonging the run to the point of agony. When he eventually did convert a single of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly played a horrendous game to drop serve once more; Djokovic had lulled him into a battle secondary to the real battle and forced him to use excessive energy to win it. Down set points in the final game, Fritz’s primary delivery floated to heaven. He prolonged the contest twice on his second serve, but finally committed two errors. It wasn’t a choke, in my opinion, only a result of needing to hit too many second serves.

The match was fairly compelling evidence that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to defeat any form of the Serbian, that was defeated by Alcaraz in the following match and did not particularly appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is absolutely acceptable – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and might not be at the peak of his physical powers now, but has acquired enough experience and tactical know-how to compensate for a significant portion of the decline. The problem is the individuals who were anticipating Fritz to win, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was had not done anything that indicated he could.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the circuit regardless. He’s a calm, thoughtful presence in press conferences, exceeding almost everyone on the men's tour aside from the Russian star, prepared to not only say his emotions or the tactic he believed decided a contest, but explain it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the blame for America not spawn a male major champion since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Since Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can divide that burden.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

American legend Division

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably dwell on it indefinitely if I fail to do it,” the American told a journalist in June of winning a major. I hope he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not achieve that objective, that overcoming the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable reign is actually extremely unlikely for all other players. {